How Australia's Deterrence Media Campaigns, Strict Enforcement Policies, and Offshore Processing Can Reform the European Union's Approach to Irregular Migration and Asylum
Keywords:
European Union, Migration, Australia's Deterrence, Asylum, FrontexAbstract
The European Union spent approximately €7.6 billion on migration and asylum management in 2024, yet recorded 669,365 first-time asylum applications in 2025 [1], maintained a structurally inadequate effective return rate of 24.3% in 2024, and has 1.22 million cases pending decision. Against this spending-deterrence paradox, this paper makes a targeted, evidence-based contribution by focusing on two analytically distinct but operationally inseparable dimensions of Australia's Operation Sovereign Borders (OSB) framework, its deterrence media campaign architecture, and its strict enforcement and policy deterrence mechanisms. These are the two dimensions most conspicuously absent from the EU's existing migration governance architecture, and the two with the highest potential returns per euro of investment. Australia's "No Way - You Will Not Make Australia Home" campaign spent AUD $10 million per year (approximately €6 million) on algorithmically targeted social media, multilingual broadcasting, IOM-managed physical materials, and diplomatic community engagement across 12+ countries and 16 languages. Backed by credible maritime interception, a "no settlement" legislative bar, and a Temporary Protection Visa framework, the campaign contributed to a upto 98% reduction in irregular maritime arrivals by 2014. In March 2026, Australian authorities resolved a maritime smuggling venture with zero irregular arrivals successfully reaching the mainland over a decade of operational effectiveness. The EU has no equivalent coordinated deterrence communication strategy; no centralized deterrence campaign budget; and no "no advantage" equivalent. Drawing on the most current available data (EUAA [2], Eurostat [1], Frontex [3], Australian Department of Home Affairs [4]), this paper maps Australia's full campaign architecture and costs; analyses the EU's comprehensive migration funding landscape (AMIF €9.88bn 2021-2027; Frontex €922M 2024; €6bn+ in external partnerships); critically evaluates the gap between EU spending and deterrence outcomes; and proposes ten evidence-based, not-yet-in-practice policy recommendations that go beyond existing academic literature. The paper also engages honestly with the human costs and legal constraints that bound any transferable adaptation for the EU context.
References
[1] Eurostat, “Asylum and migration statistics – applications, decisions, and trends (migr_asyappctza and related tables),” Luxembourg: European Commission, 2026.
[2] European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA), “Latest Asylum Trends 2025: Annual Analysis; Annual Report on the Situation of Asylum in the European Union 2025,” Luxembourg/Valletta: EUAA, 2026.
[3] Frontex (European Border and Coast Guard Agency), “Irregular border crossings down 26% in 2025,” Warsaw: Frontex, 15 Jan. 2026.
[4] Australian Department of Home Affairs, “Immigration Detention and Community Statistics Summary,” Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2024.
[5] Eurostat, “Asylum applications – monthly statistics; Asylum and Return Statistics 2024,” Luxembourg: European Union, 2025.
[6] European Court of Auditors, “EU Readmission Cooperation with Third Countries: Relevant Actions Yielded Limited Results,” Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.
[7] C. Boswell, European Migration Policies in Flux. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
[8] A. Geddes, Immigration and European Integration: Beyond Fortress Europe? Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008.
[9] S. Lavenex, “Multilevelling EU External Governance: The Role of International Organizations in the Diffusion of EU Migration Policies,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 554–570, 2016.
[10] S. Carrera and L. Den Hertog, “A European Border and Coast Guard: What’s in a Name?” CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, 2016.
[11] M. Collyer and R. King, “Producing Transnational Space: International Migration and the Extra-Territorial Reach of State Power,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 185–204, 2015.
[12] J. C. Hathaway, The Rights of Refugees under International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[13] M. Gibney, The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[14] A. Triandafyllidou, Migration and Pandemics: Spaces of Solidarity and Spaces of Exception. Cham: Springer, 2020.
[15] K. Coddington, “Migration Deterrence Campaigns and Their Limits,” Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 211–229, 2024.
[16] R. Pagogna and P. Sakdapolrak, “Disciplining Migration Aspirations through Information Campaigns,” International Migration, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 214–230, 2021.
[17] R. Andersson, Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe. Oakland: University of California Press, 2014.
[18] V. Moreno-Lax, “The EU Humanitarian Border and the Securitization of Human Rights,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 119–140, 2018.
[19] Coalition of Australia, “The Coalition’s Operation Sovereign Borders Policy,” ParlInfo, Australian Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2013.
[20] K. Coddington, “The enforcement infrastructure of public information campaigns: Australia’s No Way campaign, colonial logics, and the production of value,” Political Geography, vol. 112, 2024.
[21] K. Coddington, “Deterrence for whom? Public information campaigns as border internalization in Australia,” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, vol. 43, no. 1, 2025.
[22] M. Geibel, F. Fozdar, and F. McGaughey, “‘No way. You will not make Australia home’: Anti-asylum discursive transfer from Australia to Europe,” Current Sociology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2024.
[23] International Organization for Migration (IOM), “Missing Migrants Project – 2025 Annual Report,” Geneva: IOM, 2026.
[24] European Commission DG HOME, “Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) 2021-2027,” Brussels: European Commission, 2025.
[25] Frontex, “Budgetary and Financial Management Report 2024,” Warsaw: Frontex, 2024.
[26] Migration Policy Institute, “Global Spending on Immigration Enforcement,” Washington, D.C.: MPI, 2023.
[27] Statewatch, “€2 billion in 15 years: how Frontex finances Fortress Europe,” London: Statewatch, 2025.
[28] PICUM, “Revision of the long-term EU budget: What implications for migration and asylum policy 2024-2027?” Brussels: PICUM, 2024.
[29] ECRE (European Council on Refugees and Exiles), “Revision of the long-term EU budget: What implications for migration and asylum policy 2024-2027?” Brussels: ECRE, 2024.
[30] Statista, “Frontex budget statistics,” Hamburg: Statista GmbH, 2024.
[31] Euronews, “Money spent by EU on migration policy becoming ‘complex’ to track – expert,” 4 Jul. 2023.
[32] Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP), “Annual Report 2016-17,” Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2017.
[33] Wikipedia contributors, “Operation Sovereign Borders,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 2026.
[34] Quartz, “Australia is making covert propaganda videos to scare off asylum seekers,” New York: Quartz Media, 20 Jul. 2022.
[35] SBS News, “What is Operation Sovereign Borders, and why are Australia’s politicians fighting about it?” Sydney: SBS, 20 Feb. 2024.
[36] Clingendael Institute, “In Search of Control: Australia Country Report – The Price of Deterrence,” The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations, 2024.
[37] European Court of Human Rights, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy [GC], App. No. 27765/09, 2012.
[38] European Court of Human Rights, Khlaifia and Others v Italy [GC], App. No. 16483/12, 2016.
[39] European Parliament (EPRS), “Measuring irregular migration and returns in the EU,” Briefing, Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service, 22 Jan. 2025.
[40] Refugee Council of Australia, “Operation Sovereign Borders offshore detention statistics,” Sydney: RCOA, 2024.
[41] C. Loughnan et al., “Attenuated Governance in Australia’s Offshore Immigration Detention Regime,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 50, no. 4, 2024.
[42] ABC News (Australia), “Government Facebook ads tell migrant Australians to deter family members from arriving illegally,” Sydney: ABC, 7 Nov. 2016.
[43] C. González Enríquez, “The EU Pact on Migration and Asylum: context, challenges and limitations,” Real Instituto Elcano, Madrid, 2024.
[44] G. Knaus, “The EU Migration Pact: Why it will not reduce illegal immigration,” Gerald Knaus Policy Analysis, 2024.
[45] Law Library of Congress, “Australia: Offshore Processing of Asylum Seekers,” Washington, D.C.: Global Legal Research Directorate, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
