An Amalgamation of the Process and Genre Approaches to Teaching Writing


  • Xhevdet Rusinovci University of Prizren “UkshinHoti”, Rruga e Shkronjave 1, Prizren 20000, Kosovo


Writing Skills, ; Process-Genre Approach, Pre-University Writing Development


Teaching writing is of special importance and of increasing interest at high schools in recent years. There are several approaches to teaching writing used by teachers and educators since many years to remember. And yet, despite of the fact that learners might have reached an advanced level of language communication, one of the major concerns voiced by language teachers is that their level of writing competency seems to be lower than expected. Cumming  and Matsuda [3, 23] state that L2 practitioners are still in search of a coherent, comprehensive theory. Therefore, this paper aims at proposing a coherent theory of teaching writing by integrating the two major approaches: the process approach and the genre approach. It will serve as a direction for future research that may improve the instruction pedagogy in second language writing settings.


A. Arndt.“Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing.”English Language Teaching Journal, vol. 41(1), pp. 257-67, 1987.

A. Cumming. “Writing expertise and second language proficiency.”LanguageLearning, vol.39(1), pp.81-135, 1989.

A.Cumming. “Theoretical perspectives on writing” in Grabe, W. Ed.AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics, Boston: Cambridge University Press 1998, pp. 61-78.

A. Pincas. Writing in English 1. London: Macmillan, 1982.

A. M.Johns. “Genre and pedagogical purposes.”Journal of Second LanguageWriting, vol. 4(1), pp. 181-89, 1995.

B. Paltridge. “Genre, text type and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom.” in Genre in the

Classroom, A. M. Johns (Ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2001, pp. 73-90.

C.L. Keh. “Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation.” ELT Journal, vol.44(4), pp. 294-304, 1990.

D. Atkinson. “Writing and culture in the post-process era.” Journal of SecondLanguage Writing, vol.12, pp. 49-63, 2003.

D.G. Kehl. “The art of writing evaluative comments on students’ themes.” English Journal, vol.59, pp. 972-80, 1970.

I. Leki. “L2 writing: a commentary.”Learning and Instruction, vol.10, pp. 101-105, 1992.

J. Muncie. “Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes.”ELTJournal, vol. 54(1), pp. 47-53, 2000.

J. Myles. “Second language writing and research: the writing process anderror analysis in student texts.”Teaching English as a Second or ForeigLanguage, vol. 6(2), pp. 1-19, 2002.

J. Swales. English in Academic and Research Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

G. Pullman. “Stepping yet again into the same current.” in Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing Process Paradigm.T. Kent Ed. Carbondale,IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999, pp. 16-29.

K. Hyland. “Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process.”Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 12, pp. 17-29, 2003.

L. Flowerdew. “Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structurein academic writing.”ELT Journal, vol.54(4), pp. 369-378, 2000.

L. Prodromou. “The backwash effect: from testing to teaching.”EnglishLanguage Teaching Journal, vol.21(1), pp. 1-25, 1995.

L.Vygotsky. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher PsychologicalProcesses. Cambridge: Harvard

University Press, 1978.

M. Macken-Horarik. “Something to shoot for’: a systemic functional approachto teaching genre in secondary school science.” in Genrein the Classroom, A.M. Johns, Ed. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2002, pp. 17-42.

M. Swain. “Three functions of output in second language learning.” in Princple and Practice in Applied Linguistics.G. Cook &B.Seidlhofer, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 125-144.

O.S. Villamil & M.C.M. de Guerrero. ”Assessing the impact of peer revisionon L2 writing.”Applied Linguistics, vol.19(4), pp.491-514, 1998.

P. Brakus. “A product/process/genre approach to teaching writing: a synthesis of approaches in a letter writing course for non-native English-speaking administrativepersonnel.” Unpublished Dissertation, University of Surrey, 2003.

P. Matsuda. “Situating ESL writing in a cross-disciplinary context.“WrittenCommunication, vol.15(1), pp. 19-121, 1999.

P. Matsuda. “Process and post-process: A discursive history.”Journal of SecondLanguage, vol.12, pp. 5-83, 2003.

R. Badger & G. White. “A process genre approach to teaching writing.” ELT Journal, vol. 54(2), pp. 153-160, 2000.

S. Feez. “Heritage and innovation in second language education. “ In Genre in the Classroom, A. M. John, Ed., Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2002.

S. Freedman. “Outside-in and inside-out: peer response groups in two ninthgradeclasses.”Research in the

Teaching of English, vol.26(1), pp. 71-107, 1992.

T. Silva. “Second language cornposition instruction: Developrnents, issues, and directions in ESL.” In, Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, B. Kroll, Ed. Carnbridge: Carnbridge University Press, 1990, pp. 11-23.

S. J. Shin. “The reflective L2 writing teacher.”ELT Journal, vol.57(1), pp. 3-10, 2003.

S. Krashen. “The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications.” London:Longman, 1995.

S. Reid. The Prentice Hall Guide to College Writing (Teacher’s Manual). Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.1992.

T. Caudery. “What the “process approach” means to practising teachers of second language writing Skills.”Teaching English as a Second or ForeignLanguage, vol.1(2), pp. 1-12, 1995.

T. Caudery.“Increasing students’ awareness of genre through text transformationexercises: an old classroom activity revisited.” TESL-EJ, vol.3.3.A2, pp.1-15, 1998.

T. M. Paulus. “The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing.”Journal of Second Language Writing, vol.8(3), pp. 265-289, 1999.

Tribble, C. Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.




How to Cite

Rusinovci, X. . (2022). An Amalgamation of the Process and Genre Approaches to Teaching Writing. International Journal of Social Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 13(1), 73–81. Retrieved from