Impact of Digital Technology on Teaching and Learning Process at University Level
Keywords:
digital technology, University, Teaching, Learning processAbstract
This paper is expected to introduce the effect of advanced innovation in instructing and learning measure. The review has been directed to investigate positive and adverse consequences of using innovation inside the training area at college level. The examination technique proposed in this review is quantitative exploration through the overview. The 25 educators and 25 understudies have partaken in this review. The chi-square technique is utilized to investigate the outcomes. Through poll, the review has been investigating the impacts that understudies and instructor experience while using advanced innovation in educating and concentrating and how the two of them react to it. Subsequently the outcomes show that the exploration amplified that advanced innovation influence the nature of schooling and overburden, yet improve simplicity of social occasion data, which upgrade scholarly accomplishment. In any case, the verification isn't approving since they lean toward up close and personal learning and educating as a result of customary concerns. Out of 50 reactions 33% are utilizing google internet searcher for accumulate data and rest of others favored library for credible data. 41% understudies are less propelled towards learning. They become lethargic due to computerized innovation. Be that as it may, the advanced framework emphatically impacts the understudy's presentation in scholastics in light of simplicity of information and assets accessibility. With those arrangement, the examination featured that advanced innovation straightforwardly impacts the learning and showing measure at college level.
References
O. Apuke, "Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach", Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 40-47, 2017. Available: 10.12816/0040336.
K. Archer, R. Savage, S. Sanghera-Sidhu, E. Wood, A. Gottardo and V. Chen, "Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis", Computers & Education, vol. 78, pp. 140-149, 2014. Available: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.001
J. Bassili and S. Joordens, "Media Player Tool Use, Satisfaction with Online Lectures andExamination Performance", JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATIONREVUE DE L’ÉDUCATION À DISTANCE, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 93-108, 2018. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228684226_Media_player_tool_use_satisfaction_with_online_lectures_and_examination_performance.
J. Brill and C. Galloway, "Perils and promises: University instructors' integration of technology in classroom-based practices", British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 95-105, 2007. Available: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00601.x
F. Biagi and M. Loi, "Measuring ICT Use and Learning Outcomes: evidence from recent econometric studies", European Journal of Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 28-42, 2013. Available: 10.1111/ejed.12016
C. Blackwell, "TEACHER PRACTICES WITH MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATING TABLET COMPUTERS INTO THE EARLY CHILDHOOD CLASSROOM", Journal of Education Research, vol. 7, no. 4, 2013.
P. Dillenbourg, “Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems”, Distance Education, 29(2), 127-140, 2008.
P. Garrison, and T. Anderson, “Transforming and enhancing university teaching: stronger and weaker technological influences in T. Evans & D. Nation (eds.), Changing university teaching: Reflections of creating educational technologies”, Kogan Page, London.2000
M., Grabe, and C. Grabe, “Integrating technology for meaningful learning” (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.
P.,Greasley, “Quantitative Data Analysis Using Spss: An Introduction For Health AndSocial Science. [ebook] UK”: McGraw-Hill Education. Available at: https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/Quantitative_Data_Analysis_Using_Spss_An.html?id=B3Vx5XwJv64C&redir_esc=y 2007
S., Ghavifekr, M., Afshari, and S. Amla. “Management strategies for E-Learning system as the core component of systemic change: A qualitative analysis” Life Science Journal, 9(3), 2190-2196., 2012
S., Higgins, Z., Xiao, M., Katsipataki, “The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation”. 2012.
S., Hess, “Digital Media and Student Learning: Impact of Electronic Books on Motivation and Achievement”. New England Reading Association Journal, July. 2014
A. Kirkwood, and L. Price, “Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences”. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice7:1 30(3), 257-274., 2015
S., Kalyuga, “Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive e-learning environments: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review”, Interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends 19, 387–399. 2007
M., Saunders, P., Lewis, and A. Thornhill, (2007). “Research methods for business students” (4th ed.): London: Prentice Hall 2007
H. Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research”. International Journal of Academic Research in Management. 5. 18-27. 10.2139/ssrn.3205035. 2016
B. Taheri, C. Porter, C. König, and Kanellos, N. “Quantitative Data Analysis Approaches”. 10.23912/978-1-910158-51-7-2786. 2016
C. Yip, N. Han, and B. Sng, “Legal and issues in research”. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 60. 684. 10.4103/0019-5049.190627,. 2016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 International Scientific Research and Researchers Association (ISRRA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.
